Thursday, 14 March 2013

Short review: Triangle

Director: Christopher Smith
(2009)

There are so many things to be said about Triangle, yet so little of it can actually be communicated. Triangle is a relatively unknown psychological thriller masquerading as a dumb horror. Unlike others in this subgenre, Triangle twists and turns not to set up a 3rd act plot twist, but to develop its revelation that occurs in the 1st act. 30 minutes in and things are looking grim, the cast is tiny in size and obtuse clues point towards our heroine Jess (Melissa George) being insane. An in a flash director Christopher Smith turns the film on its head, with the ocean liner our protagonists are stuck on becoming almost as intriguing as the Overlook Hotel. While its narrative complexity causes some convolution, Triangle is a very solid film, intent to cater to the more cerebral horror fans. A smart, satisfying film that deserves a lot more recognition.



The Walking Dead Season 3 Episode 12 review: Clear



!!!!!!WARNING SEASON 1 AND 3 SPOILERS!!!!!!
CLICK THE LINK TO VIEW


The Grey review



Ottway: A job at the end of the world. A salaried killer for a big petroleum company. I don't know why I did half the things I've done, but I know this is where I belong, surrounded by my own. Ex-cons, fugitives, drifters, assholes. Men unfit for mankind. 

Director: Joe Carnahan
(2012)
Whatever you think you know about The Grey needs to be forgotten instantly. Despite what the trailers want you to believe, this isn’t a film about Liam Neeson being an unstoppable badass who has a penchant for punching wolves in the face; Taken set in the wilds of Alaska if you will. Director Joe Carnahan’s latest is nothing of the sort. Instead we’re served a survival film as much about man vs. environment as it is man vs. killer wolf. Make no mistake, The Grey isn’t particularly realistic, but is redeemed by some strong core components that make for an enjoyable final product.

What instantly scuppers any preconceptions of The Grey is the opening monologue from Neesons Ottway, a letter to a loved one who he is no longer with. This written poetry is backed up with some evocative shots of the unforgiving Alaskan landscape, as smoke gently rises out of chimneys into the pitch black sky. Ottway is a wolf hunter, employed to keep the other men- of which he describes as Ex-cons, fugitives, drifters and assholes – safe. Before a plane leaves to take everybody home, Ottway puts his rifle in his mouth, intent to pull the trigger. His distressing action is stopped by the cry of a wolf in the distance, the irony not immediately apparent. He chooses to board the plane, only for it to crash in the wilderness, forcing him and 6 other survivors to fend off against a pack of deadly wolves all while searching for rescue.


What helps keep The Grey fresh through its 2 hour running time is director Joe Carnahan’s ability to successfully straddle multiple genres. The plane crash and resulting aftermath are indicative of various survival films, as the oil workers battle the elements to rescue the injured and remain as warm as possible. Within 10 minutes it’s an action flick as Ottway gets mauled by the wolves in the surrounding area. By nightfall, things shift towards horror, the wolves eyes shimmer from the abyss of darkness that surrounds our protagonists. While the survival aspects aren’t realistic enough, the action too poorly shot and the horror relatively unfrightening, Carnahan gives just the right amount of development on each. The result is a film that's far greater than the sum of its parts.

While the characters won’t be remembered for their names, the film packs a strong punch around a campfire at the midway point, as our protagonists tell each other stories to quell the fear of an impending wolf attack. Carnahan makes us care, as these broken men talk about their families and children and their longing to see them again. Such a tender moment is shattered in my head and despite its opening monologue and survival aspects, The Grey eventually boils down to a horror film; I know these people won’t make it to the end. It’s a surreal emotion, films like this are usually populated by empty stereotypes, and the last time I yearned for the entire cast of a horror film to survive to the credits was James Cameron’s Aliens.


The intensity of the survivors descent into the barren tundra is proliferated by some sound technical work; a quality blend of CGI and practical effects. The wolves are an interesting blend of animation and puppetry, courtesy of The Walking Dead’s makeup maestro Greg Nicotero. While the CG isn’t much cop, it is well hidden by shadows and snowstorms, an attempt at the ‘less is more’ approach. The puppets and models work better, the threat feels more real to a much larger degree. What's even more impressive is the strong sound design that augments the wolves’ feral and dangerous nature. Why show your audience when you can force them to hear ravenous growls hiding under the cover of darkness?

For all its strengths, The Grey is bound to be remembered for its failings. In reality, wolves aren’t nowhere near as malicious as they're portrayed here, and the harshness of the wilderness would’ve killed the survivors in hours due to their inability to look after themselves. Some dodge this by stating the wolves are a metaphor and the environment represents purgatory, but these arguments are weak when compared to how much the film does get correct in these regards. It needs to be taken with a fairly large dosage of salt, but The Grey is a fine survival drama, with Neeson at his best since Batman Begins.




Tuesday, 12 March 2013

Short review: Tucker and Dale Vs Evil

Director: Eli Craig
(2011)

Despite being totally stupid, there’s something so gratifying about Tucker and Dale Vs Evil. Seemingly tired with modern horror films, Director Eli Craig has crafted a fine satire that spends its time poking fun at a genre that is conventional to the point of predictability. Tucker and Dale are 2 beer loving rednecks who buy a woodland cabin as a holiday home, only to be attacked by a group of ignorant college kids our duo rescue their beautiful friend (Katrina Bowden) from drowning. What makes the film so fresh is the change of perspective, we see through the eyes of the supposed ‘villains’; good, honest men who’re misunderstood by today’s idiotic youth. Soon the gore and humour flow freely, but the film is on a slow descent by the end of the first act, the runtime unfortunately outlasts the smart, fresh concept.



Friday, 8 March 2013

The Perks of Being a Wallflower review



Charlie: I really wanna be a writer but I don't know what I'd write about. 
Sam: You can write about us. 
Patrick: Call it 'The slut and the falcon' make us solve crimes 

Director: Steven Chbosky
(2012)
2012 has been a surprisingly strong year for film. The brilliance has ranged from the explosive (The Dark Knight Rises), the clever (Looper) and the magical (Life of Pi). With such quantity in the quality of mainstream films, scores and scores of smaller, but no less entertaining films get pushed aside in cinema listings, unfairly overlooked. The Perks of Being a Wallflower is one of these films.

Perks focuses on Charlie (Logan Lerman) a troubled teenager who is about to go to a public school for the first time due to being homeschooled all his life. Through a letter for his anonymous friend he narrates his journey, offering insight to his mental condition and his feelings to how his life is unfolding. After a few days struggling being the new kid, Charlie befriends Patrick (Ezra Miller) and his half sister Sam (Emma Watson), 2 constantly quirky seniors who take him under their sheltering wing. Soon Charlie breaks free from his shell as he takes a journey to the end of his childhood that exposes who he truly is.


While Perks is most definitely a coming of age story, it’s not fuelled by adventure (the Goonies) or vast amounts of self discovery (Stand by Me). Yes, Charlie does find his place in the animal kingdom that is high school, but he adapts to fit his environment, spurred on by his need to feel normal. Despite his mental condition, Lerman makes him almost universally likable; everyone has moments of loneliness or longing while growing up. This urge to gain the respect of your peers is what Writer/Director Steven Chbosky channels constantly, a thematic choice that allows Charlie’s sometimes strange behaviour to have little impact on how relatable he is.

The trio of Lerman, Watson and Miller make up the core experience in Perks, and each is a perfect match for their characters. Watson is sublime in her first post Potter role as Sam, Charlie’s potential love interest and guide through his progression from near silent protagonist to eccentric socialite. She’s a sublime blend of dependable and seductive, although not without some serious baggage. Her brother Patrick is similar in many ways, his idiosyncratic lifestyle and warm demeanour is offset by his struggles with his hidden relationship with Brad, a fellow student with an urge to remain secret about his sexuality.


It’s in these more serious vibes that Perks suffers from its poor change in tone. One scene will consist of fun humour and engaging scenarios, only for child abuse and violent homophobia to rear their startling heads in the next. What's even more terrifying is how casually such themes are handled and the flip-flopping between styles is exceedingly uncomfortable at times. These dark moments are totally necessary, but are downplayed far too casually. The use of drugs fares much better, from a nervous Charlie eating a brownie at his first house party and getting stoned, winning him a great amount respect to doing LSD and falling asleep in the snow. Chbosky’s delicate comic touch works in the case of substance abuse but his attempts to brush other issues of so nonchalantly is detrimental to the quality of the film.

While it does tick most of the boxes of its genre, The Perks of Being a Wallflower never feels stale or derivative. There are enough jokes, relationships and chemistry between the 3 leads for the entirety of the film to work sufficiently. Chbosky’s handling of mature themes is haphazard at best and atrocious at worst, a flaw amplified considering he wrote the book the film is based upon. It may lack that powerful aura of youth that something like Stand by Me has, but that doesn’t stop Perks from being a hidden gem in a year of strong films.


Thursday, 7 March 2013

The Walking Dead Season 3 Episode 11: I Aint a Judas




!!!!!!WARNING SEASON 2 AND 3 SPOILERS!!!!!!

CLICK THE LINK TO VIEW

Short review: Big Fat Gypsy Gangster

Director: Ricky Grover
(2011)

I'm still not quite sure what inspired me to watch a film called Big Fat Gypsy Gangster. I think I was hoping to watch a film so bad its good, but I couldn’t have been more wrong. A sort of mockumentary, an American film crew follows a recently released British gangster called Bulla. The film initially focuses on his attempt to regain his empire, but loses focus and goes on about mystics and dwarf fighting arenas. The acting is weak despite some decent names, destroyed by a dire script that's light on actual laughs. After a funny opening 5 minutes, the film resorts to cock gags and racial profiling, both of which aren’t funny in the slightest. It even fails as a mockumentary, ignoring its genres rules: it’s not even shot correctly. From directing to editing, Big Fat Gypsy Gangster is an abysmal film.


Short review: Keith Lemon: The Film

Director: Paul Angunawela
(2012)

Every year there is a film that’s sole existence is to exploit money out of its fan base. Keith Lemon: The Film does exactly that. Following the crude Celebrity Juice host on an adventure from Leeds to London, Paul Angunawela only intent is to pad the abysmal storyline is with disgusting and often incredibly unfunny gags. So if semen, cock and shit jokes are your thing, every scene will cater to your tasteless needs. When putrid remarks aren’t spewing from Keith’s (Leigh Francis) mouth, synonyms for the word cock are, the icing on a horrendously bad script. The nonsensical plot is padded out with C list celebrity cameos, from washed up pop stars to the lovely yet talentless Kelly Brook. One funny moment about Rambo aside, Keith Lemon: The Movie is so offensive, cliché, humourless and mundane that it becomes a painful experience.


Sunday, 3 March 2013

The Descent review



Sam: Where are we? 
Juno: It hasn't got a name. It's a new system. I wanted us all to discover it! No one's ever been down here before. 

Director: Neil Marshall
(2005)
Neil Marshall’s 2005 horror The Descent possesses such a basic story, yet its simplicity doesn’t detract from the fear that it can produce. After witnessing the horrific past of protagonist Sarah (Shauna Macdonald), the film resumes with the arrival at a cabin in the Appalachian Mountains with an aerial helicopter shot that isn’t dissimilar to Stanley Kubrick's The Shining. Sarah meets with fellow friends (Juno, Beth, Rebecca, Sam and Holly) as they plan to go cave exploring to rebuild the bonds of the group after Sarah’s tragedy. Disaster strikes while inside the cave system, an event made considerably worse when Juno informs the girls that they're actually exploring an unmarked cave. Their venture into the unknown is amplified considerably when they discover that they are trapped 2 miles underground, and that they aren’t alone...

In its simplest form, The Descent closely follows a basic 3 act structure for most of its duration. The uneasy set up to the expedition is in place, a log cabin in the woods; complete with sheep’s skulls and the eerie nothingness that surrounds them. While this can be accurately labelled as the most mundane part of the film, the small details that crop up do an excellent job of building tension. A dead deer, a cave that's situated in the middle of nowhere and what appear to be claw marks hint at the women’s impending doom. It’s a shame that this slow build up of dread is offset by some gimmicky jump scares lazily crammed in seemingly only to fulfil the films cliché quota. Bad dreams, false scares and a flock of bats are the primary offenders here, simply director Neil Marshall trying to cater the modern horror audience.


Soon the real horror rears its head however, and The Descent becomes an uncomfortable and uneasy film, slowly twisting the screws as the metal whines and builds towards a breaking point. Our group force themselves through tiny tunnels, a claustrophobia made worse by the tight and imposing camerawork. Coupled with the caves extreme darkness, it’s enough to make anyone uneasy. What’s most striking about this third of the film is the surprisingly strong lighting work that's on display. The searching torches and cavern illuminating flares exude just the correct amount of brightness, enough for the image to be clear, but still allows this alien location to keep its secrets well hidden.

Cranking up the tension once more, Marshall throws a series of obstacles at his leads each of which becomes more and more stifling the longer the films runs. Chasms to navigate, exits to find and cave ins to avoid are the name of the game, making the environment itself a downright scary antagonist. And then comes the payoff as Sarah’s torch locates someone (or something) standing at the end of tunnel, furthering the predicament they find themselves stuck in. It’s unfortunately a small reveal, Marshall's choice to show us the silhouette of a creature drooling just minutes earlier strips our first true sighting of its menace. Soon the onslaught begins as the group is outnumbered against the attacks of these viscous cave dwelling monsters, known only as Crawlers.

Marshall instantly shifts the film up a notch, killing characters and breaking the group into 2. As much as this change of pace raises pulses, events begin to become mundane. The creatures are initially an enigma, attacking quickly from the shadows as Marshall grapples with keeping their as appearance ambiguous as possible. But soon they get more screentime that some of the human cast and the terror of their appearance is sternly diminished. What makes matters worse is how feeble these new antagonists are, easily dispatched with a swing from a pickaxe. Their malevolence is soon lost as the film draws to its audience dividing conclusion.


There's no mistake that the descent is a good horror film, capably blending tension with rewarding scares. But it feels like a film made in 2 distinct parts that causing the film to feel juxtaposed. It’s great to see an almost all female cast, many of whom are strong, if simplistic characters, but they bring the films latter stages down to that of a gory action film. Marshall's attempt to appeal to a broad spectrum of horror lovers is a choice that is unfortunately a detrimental one.


Friday, 1 March 2013

Short review: Safe

Director: Boaz Yakin
(2012)

Writer/director Boaz Yakin brings us Safe, yet another generic action flick starring Jason Statham. He’s a homeless ex cop whose life gains purpose after he saves 11 year old genius Mei, whose memory holds a very important code to a money filled vault. The story here is childishly basic, yet Yakin convolutes events to give the appearance of depth and intricacy. Regardless, the Chinese, Russians and corrupt NYPD officers battle it out for the code that Mei possesses. It’s very cliché, acting almost as filler until we stumble onto the next action sequence, of which there is a plentiful supply. Some of these are practically shot and interesting, the Russian kidnapping scene for example. Yet the majority descend into sharp edits and trite camerawork, both of which render the action incomprehensible. The climactic shootout is erratic yet immensely dull, summing up the entire film rather neatly.



The Walking Dead Season 3 Episode 9: The Suicide King



!!!!!!WARNING SEASON 3 SPOILERS!!!!!!
CLICK THE LINK TO VIEW