Roy Neary: I know this
sounds crazy, but ever since yesterday on the road, I've been seeing this
shape. Shaving cream, pillows... Dammit! I know this. I know what this is! This
means something. This is important.
Director: Steven Spielberg (1977) |
When watching a Steven Spielberg film,
there are certain expectations, no matter how open minded a viewer you are.
He's made many great films in his time, and I was sure that Close Encounters
was going to be another addition to his good list. While Close Encounters is a
decent film, it doesn’t live up to the standard of this great director’s work,
both before and after its 1977 release.
The film follows
Roy Neary, a cable worker, husband and father of 3. After witnessing flying
spaceships in the night sky, he begins his search to understand what he
witnessed, at the neglect of his job and loved ones. Richard Dreyfuss is
astonishing as Roy, a likable man, seemingly discontent with his drab suburban
lifestyle. Soon after his first extra terrestrial experience, he becomes
obsessed with a mountain, trying to understand what it symbolises. He isn’t
alone with these experiences, we see Jillian Guiler (Melinda Dillon) drawing
the mountain in her artwork; she also shared this bizarre experience with Roy
and wants to find answers.
One thing that is a mainstay in Spielberg's
films is his frequently excellent cinematography. He really frames his scenes
fantastically, and it makes for some interesting visual storytelling. This is
seamlessly coupled with some stunning visual effects from the brilliance that
is Douglas Trumbull. The first view we get of the alien crafts is a sight to
behold, and even in today’s world of CGI, this scene holds up remarkably well.
But its nothing compared to what's in store for the climax. The reveal of the
mothership is an incredible sight. Its typical Spielberg, every frame drips
with magic and wonder, the very same he would apply to E.T just 5 years later.
Roy is a very irresponsible man, though
giving him such a title might be pushing it. He’s a big kid at heart and his
love for model trains and the film Pinocchio cement this representation. He has
a compulsion to figure out the significance of the mountain and his drive to
understand the seemingly impossible is certainly interesting, but to neglect
his family and job lessens how much we can care about his struggle. What's
worse is that his kids are annoying loudmouthed brats and his wife is a total
bitch, a poor attempt at making us empathise with him.
The film is at its best when we witness
aspects of suburban life behaving in a strange manner. Record players and TV’s
switch on randomly, battery powered torches stop and start erratically and toy
cars spin into life. This anonymity gives the first half of Close Encounters a
mysterious, almost unsettling vibe, and it’s absolutely engrossing. Events
remain sufficiently interesting right up until the final 30 minutes, where we
the story is concluded in a fractured and unsatisfying manner. While I admire
ambiguity in films, Close Encounters offers plenty of questions, but we get far
too little in terms of payoff by the time the credits roll around. For a director
so inclined to beat his audience over the head with blatant symbolism and
obvious meaning, Close Encounters is happy enough to be frustratingly vague.
By the end, close encounters of the third
kind gave me a deflated feeling. It was a fantastic combination of intrigue,
thrill and wonder. The answerless ending dulls the entire experience, and the
whole experience begins to feel hollow as we stop caring for our protagonist. A
film such as this shouldn’t spell everything out to its audience, but a few
answers would have gone a long way.
6
No comments:
Post a Comment